Ofsted Visit Analysis – Page 10

All the data on these pages have been produced by SESLIP analysis of information published at Ofsted’s report pages, which involves manual data transfer and is therefore subject to errors and omissions. If you spot anything that looks wrong, please contact Richard Tyndall.

A teacher sitting on the floor, playing a game with young students in an informal classroom setting

Page 10 – Focus visits by year and by grade at time of visit as at 25/08/2026

ILACS Framework and Focus Visits

Focus of focus visits

The arrangements for focus visits are set out in paragraphs 110-121 of the ILACS framework

The first focus visit was in January 2018.

Authorities with an inadequate grade do not usually receive focus visits, as they already receive regular monitoring visits.

In 2020-2021, 42 (virtual) visits were made to check on covid responses; of these half, 21, were to authorities graded inadequate.

The framework sets out 7 possible areas of focus for focus visits. They are

  1. Front Door (FD)
  2. Children in need or subject to a protection plan (CIN/CPP)
  3. Vulnerable Children at Extra Familial Risk (VCEFR)
  4. Children in Care (CIC)
  5. Planning and Achieving Permanence (PAP)
  6. Care Leavers (CL)
  7. Placement decision making for older children (PDMOC)
  • And, no longer used, Covid arrangements (C-19)

Table 10.1: Focus visits by type and grade at time of visit

Main grade at time of focus visit FD CIN/
CPP
VC
EFR
CIC PAP CL PD
MOC
C-19Total
Outstanding12823270034
Good314081783138146
Requires improvement58643191325312197
Inadequate00000002121
Not inspected (new authorities)010010013
Total10111313392463642401
Outstanding35%24%6%9%6%21%0%0%100%
Good21%27%5%12%5%21%2%5%100%
Requires improvement29%32%2%10%7%13%2%6%100%
Inadequate0%0%0%0%0%0%0%100%100%
Not inspected (new authorities)0%33%0%0%33%0%0%33%100%
Total25%28%3%10%6%16%1%10%100%
Includes all published focus visit reports including to closed authorities

Notes

Most visits result in a narrative, ungraded report. Occasionally, when serious weaknesses are discovered one or more priority actions may be identified in the report.

This has happened 24 times (6.2% of all focus visit reports)

Table 10.2: Last 5 reports for each type of focus visit

Most recent firstFDCIN/CPPVCEFRCICPAPCLPDMOC
1Westminster 14/07/2026City of London 17/06/2026Calderdale 14/04/2025Kensington and Chelsea 14/07/2026Bedford Borough 28/04/2026Doncaster 14/07/2026Milton Keynes 13/05/2026
2Ealing 24/06/2026Buckinghamshire 09/06/2026Kensington and Chelsea 15/06/2022Cambridgeshire 09/06/2026Bexley 13/02/2025Hackney 23/06/2026Kingston upon Hull 15/07/2025
3Redbridge 19/05/2026Stockton-on-Tees 09/12/2025Westminster 15/06/2022Durham 15/05/2026Doncaster 26/06/2024Hartlepool 19/05/2026Barnsley 5/11/2024
4Rutland 24/03/2026Bristol
03/12/2025
Hertfordshire 21/07/2021Barking and Dagenham 25/03/2026Stoke-on-Trent 04/10/2023Hampshire 24/03/2026Sheffield 29/10/2024
5Cumberland 03/03/2026West Sussex
25/11/2025
Hounslow 14/07/2021Windsor and Maidenhead 13/01/2026Sheffield 21/09/2022Leicester 17/03/2026Stockton-on-Tees 18/09/2024

Table 10.3: Focus visits by year and type

YearFDCIN/
CPP
VC
EFR
CICPAPCLPD
MOC
C-19Total
2018301832690068
2019181624730050
202026120001829
202111174925024 72
2022141226580047
202391004180032
2024212031144036
202572014181042
20268205181025
Total10111313392463642401
*Counts only open authorities

Table 10.4: Focus visits – more analysis

Number of authorities
No focus visits yet1, a new authority
One focus visit153
Two focus visits134
Three focus visits75
Four focus visits29
Five focus visits10
excludes closed authorities

*No visit yet: Cumberland;

**Westmorland and Furness created after Focus1 round closed.

Grade at time of visit% of all authority days at this grade since 1/1/2018% of non-inadequate authority-days at this grade since 1/1/2018% of focus visits since 1/1/2018
Outstanding15%17%9%
Good40%46%38%
Requires Improvement32%36%52%
Inadequate12%n/an/a
Not inspected (new authorities)1%1%1%
This analysis disregards the 42 focus visits made to check on Covid-19 responses. They are recorded in tables 10.1 and 10.3 above.

Our friends at LIIA, working with D2I have produced more Ofsted analysis Ofsted inspections Power BI dashboard (external link hosted by LIIA). The dashboard has five pages and covers ILACS and SEND inspections, with all manner of filters and visualisations available.

All the data on these pages have been produced by SESLIP analysis of information published at Ofsted’s report pages, which involves manual data transfer and is therefore subject errors and omissions. If you spot anything that looks wrong, please contact Richard Tyndall 07880-787007