Ofsted Visit Analysis – Page 5

All the data on these pages have been produced by SESLIP analysis of information published at Ofsted’s report pages, which involves manual data transfer and is therefore subject to errors and omissions. If you spot anything that looks wrong, please contact Richard Tyndall.

A teacher sitting on the floor, playing a game with young students in an informal classroom setting

Outcome of ILACS, SIF, SLAC inspections by region

Table 5.1 Outcome of ILACS 2 inspections by region compared to previous grade as at 16/7/2024

Table 5.2 Outcome of ILACS 1 inspections by region compared to previous grade

ILACS
2
Outsta
nding
GoodRIInade
quate
Not yet
inspe
cted
TotalTotal ptsAve ptsChange from
ILACS1
Change from
ILACS1
 4 pts3 pts2 pts1 pt0 pts   pointsave per insp
EE2021611132.6000.00
EM2301410183.0030.50
IL13001014133.2551.25
OL43111019283.1120.22
NE2120712153.0040.80
NW05441124272.0810.08
SW1032915122.00-3-0.50
WM1232614182.2500.00
YH2511615262.8950.56
England without SE15221612691341702.62170.26
SE1640819302.7340.36
England16282012771532002.63210.28
England without SE11%16%12%9%51%100%    
SE5%32%21%0%42%100%    
England10%18%13%8%50%100%    
Includes Cumberland; Westmorland and Furness; excludes Cumbria now closed

ILACS
1
Outsta
nding
GoodRIInade
quate
Not yet
inspe
cted
TotalTotal
pts
Ave
pts
Change from
SIF
1/2
Change from
SIF
1/2
 4 pts3 pts2 pts1 pt0 pts   pointsave per Insp
EE2621011312.8240.36
EM2260010262.6020.20
IL5441014413.1140.29
OL41320019593.11150.79
NE2532012312.5830.25
NW07115023482.09-2-0.09
SW1752015372.4770.47
WM1661014352.5080.57
YH3435015352.33-3-0.20
England without SE2054421701333432.58380.29
SE4672019502.63100.53
England2460491901523932.59480.32
Eng without SE15%41%32%13%0%100%    
SE21%32%37%11%0%100%    
England16%39%32%13%0%100%    
Includes Cumbria, West Nothamptonshire, North Northamptonshire, Dorset (new), Bournemouth Christchurch and Poole
Excludes Cumberland, Westmorland and Furness, Northamptonshire, Dorset (old), Bournemouth, Poole.

ADCS also monitors the outcomes of ILACS inspections – see here for access to their spreadsheet

Table 5.3 Outcome of SIF1 inspections by region compared to SLAC/LACPI

 Table 5.4 Outcome of SLAC inspections by region

SIF1Outsta
nding
GoodRIInade
quate
No of LAs Total points Ave per inspected LAChange from SLAC/LACPI
4 pts3 pts2pts1 pt
EE055111262.3620.18
EM04419212.33-1-0.11
IL263314352.50-7-0.50
OL097319442.32-2-0.11
NE055212272.25-6-0.50
NW0611623462.00-7-0.30
SW039416311.94-6-0.38
WM036514261.86-1-0.07
YH156315342.2730.20
England without SE34656281332902.18-25-0.19
SE059519382.00-2-0.11
England35165331523282.16-27-0.18
England without SE2%35%42%21%100%    
SE0%26%47%26%100%    
England2%34%43%22%100%    
SLACOutsta
nding
GoodAde
quate
Inade
quate
No of LAsTotal pointsAve per inspected
LA
 4 pts3 pts2 pts1pt   
EE045211242.18
EM12519212.33
IL2102014423.00
OL088319432.26
NE246012322.67
NW0119323542.35
SW075416352.19
WM028414261.86
YH048315312.07
England without
SE
55256201333082.32
SE0511319402.11
England55767231523482.29
England without
SE
4%39%42%15%100%  
SE0%26%58%16%100%  
England3%38%44%15%100%  

ADCS also monitors the outcomes of ILACS inspections – see here for access to their spreadsheet

All the data on these pages have been produced by SESLIP analysis of information published at Ofsted’s report pages, which involves manual data transfer and is therefore subject to errors and omissions. If you spot anything that looks wrong, please contact Richard Tyndall 07880-787007